Primary HPV Testing vs. Co-testing for Cervical Cancer Screening
نویسنده
چکیده
. Where the Story Begins The incidence of cervical cancer in the US has declined dramatically over the last half century and continues to decline to this day. In 1975, the incidence of cervical cancer was 14.8 per 100,000 women; by the year 2013 that number was only 6.4 per 100,000. Similarly, the mortality due to cervical cancer during the same period was reduced from 5.6 to 2.3 women per 100,000.** It is widely accepted that secondary prevention of cervical cancer, i.e., the detection and eradication of precancerous lesions, is almost entirely responsible for this observed reduction, and clearly the most important step at which to intervene.1 The Pap test, developed by George Papanicolau in 1941, gained widespread use in the 1960s and became a part of a well-woman exam. Although many have questioned the clinical sensitivity of the Pap test, its efficacy in reducing cervical cancer is unchallenged. In the US, the Pap test is thought to be responsible for an 80% reduction in the incidence of cervical cancer.2 Comparing rates of cervical cancer from countries that have implemented national screening programs, such as Great Britain, to countries where no such programs exist, such as Brazil, shows astonishing differences. While the incidence in both countries is similar in women under the
منابع مشابه
Pnm-17: Cost Effectiveness of Human Papillomavirus Testing in Cervical Cancer Diagnosis
Background: Epidemiological studies are shown robust association between human papillomavirus (HPV) and cervical cancer. From 1990 HPV was known as a necessary but insufficient cause of cervical invasive cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of HPV test in cervical cancer screening. Materials and Methods: This is a systematic review article; the newest scienti...
متن کاملThe Clinical and Economic Benefits of Co-Testing Versus Primary HPV Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening: A Modeling Analysis
BACKGROUND Consensus United States cervical cancer screening guidelines recommend use of combination Pap plus human papillomavirus (HPV) testing for women aged 30 to 65 years. An HPV test was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2014 for primary cervical cancer screening in women age 25 years and older. Here, we present the results of clinical-economic comparisons of Pap plus HPV mRN...
متن کاملA cross‐sectional study on HPV testing with type 16/18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening in 11,064 Chinese women
Cytology-based cervical cancer screening is restricted because of a lack of cytologists. Thus, HPV-based instead of cytology-based screening may be a more suitable strategy in China. Here, we assessed the effectiveness of HPV testing (Cobas® 4800 Test, Roche) and HPV-based programs to detect high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) or cancer compared with cytology (Thinprep, Hologic)...
متن کاملCervical cancer risk for women undergoing concurrent testing for human papillomavirus and cervical cytology: a population-based study in routine clinical practice.
BACKGROUND Concurrent testing for human papillomavirus (HPV) and cervical cytology (co-testing) is an approved alternative to cytology alone in women aged 30 years and older. We aimed to assess the safety in routine clinical practice of 3-year screening intervals for women testing negative for HPV with normal cytology and to assess if co-testing can identify women at high risk of cervical cance...
متن کاملCost effectiveness of high-risk HPV DNA testing for cervical cancer screening in South Africa.
OBJECTIVE To determine the cost effectiveness of several cervical cancer screening strategies utilizing HPV testing in South Africa. METHODS We developed a lifetime Markov model of the costs, quality of life, and survival associated with screening and treating cervical cancer and its precursors. Screening strategies evaluated included: 1) conventional cytology, 2) cytology followed by HPV tes...
متن کاملCost analysis of different cervical cancer screening strategies in Mexico.
OBJECTIVE To compare the costs and number of undetected cases of four cervical cancer screening strategies (CCSS) in Mexico. MATERIALS AND METHODS We estimated the costs and outcomes of the following CCSS: a) conventional Papanicolaou smear (Pap) alone; b) high-risk human papilloma virus testing (HR-HPV) as primary screening with Pap as reflex triage; c) HR-HPV as primary screening with HPV-1...
متن کامل